- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 26, 2007 at 12:33 am #743638
Anonymous
InactiveFrom what I seem to remember they threw the syndicates out and paid the individuals. Took a while to sort.
July 26, 2007 at 12:54 am #743643Anonymous
Guestthanks Dom for the reply.
However I just can’t see a syndicate.. making any difference. As long as there weren’t multiple accounts created … and terms were met …. payments should be made.
pretty simple for me. Now I am as most know . …. against bonuses … but I also beleive that if you make the offer ….. create the terms for it … then you ought to honor any body …. whether they are a group or individual …. that meets the terms and beats you fairly.
again I note that if they were creating multiple accounts …… or some other legit reason for calling them fraud… then I think that they should be kicked out… not paid etc.
But if they didn’t break what is the line of being true fraud . whether it was a group that shares info …. or whatever … they still met the requirements and therefore I don’t see it right to not pay them.
So with that in mind… I guess my question re-stated is ….. was this group that was not paid ……. really guilty of fraud or did the just beat the system and Fortune didn’t like it?
matters to me.
thanks again for replies.
July 26, 2007 at 1:45 am #743650Anonymous
InactiveThey can’t tell you what type of fraud it was because then everyone and his brother will run and try this out.
So you gotta either believe them or not.
I decided to believe them. Most of the complainants in this were one post wonders and disappeared quickly.
-
AuthorPosts