Why isn’t the PPA all over Paul?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #606807
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Why isn’t the PPA all over Paul?

    Shouldn’t they be?

    His position is 100% better than the idea of Barney Frank convincing enough people that they can regulate and tax poker. I mean, considering that Paul would see it as a personal liberty issue where there’s no government involvement needed…

    Does the PPA have an agenda other than personal freedom for poker players? If not, it would seem like a Paul endorsement is a no-brainer. Is there another candidate who would say the same? And mean it? Who? Or who is even close?

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)