- This topic is empty.
- January 8, 2008 at 7:02 pm #606807AnonymousInactive
Why isn’t the PPA all over Paul?
Shouldn’t they be?
His position is 100% better than the idea of Barney Frank convincing enough people that they can regulate and tax poker. I mean, considering that Paul would see it as a personal liberty issue where there’s no government involvement needed…
Does the PPA have an agenda other than personal freedom for poker players? If not, it would seem like a Paul endorsement is a no-brainer. Is there another candidate who would say the same? And mean it? Who? Or who is even close?