@Casino-guide.se 222490 wrote:
what I see as strange with this problem is that if it is a employee that sells or try to get traffic to another site for one or another reason, why would they go for inactive accounts, it is not like getting a signup is worth something.
I would understand if a test account was made and £1000 was deposited, then that player would get some attention, but why steal and risk getting caught for a no deposit client?
So either some kind of spyware on the guys testing this, but on the other hand if two affiliates tested it and got the same it sounds very strange indeed.
So more likely a common practice with the original company to transfer players, cause they would not have time or energy to go in and manually check each individual account, which for instance a CS agent would have time to do.
Just my thoughts
There is no spyware on our computers. We all use Macs in our office so spyware and viruses aren’t a concern like they are with say, Windows machines. And like you said, it isn’t like I didn’t get independent verification in this thread from another affiliate- you saw that I did.
Why not market every player? A man doesn’t step on the lot if he doesn’t want to buy. I don’t see a reason to only hit the depositors if you can easily hit everyone. They are not marketing to inactive accounts. They are marketing to fresh signups- people that maybe are thinking about depositing but want to try out the casino first, in addition to all of the people who are depositing out of the gate.
I can tell you from all the email marketing we do on the non-gaming verticals that fresh leads like this are the very best you can get.