@gamblingbutler 213632 wrote:
That’s why I said “shouldn’t be paid entirely by the affiliate”. We learned to live with carrying the share of payment processing costs with some brands and the share of the chargeback as well, that is no biggie if it doesn’t turn into a regular thing. But deducting everything from the affiliate is still wrong in my opinion.
I can understand why you would think that, but take into consideration the other “costs” that go with being an operator…
For revshare – no negative carryovers.. no bundling etc etc..
Running costs, wages, bills, royalties.
A player wins 40k on the last day of the month then drops it back on the first day of the following month… thats the operator paying the affiliate a commission on money that never came in from that player.
As I mentioned previously, where I can I take only the amount earned from the chargeback.. but I can absolutely see the side of the fence that would want to charge the whole cost of the chargeback.
The business partnership can’t just be there when one side wants it.. It has to be there all the time and if that were more heavily enforced, I think we would probably see less groups screwing people over. Noone wants to work with someone who only plays by their own rules.. I think we can establish that as the truth.