@Renee 206842 wrote:
OK this is my second try. Had a whole post written out but IE closed itself for no bloody good reason whatsoever..[/quote]
Haha… and ouch! Happened to me all the time – so I no longer use IE except when absolutely necessary… try Chrome, it always stores the intended postQuote:There is also the case of affiliate fraud here. An affiliate who knows the player sends the player to play at one of our casinos, placing these kind of bets to make money through the affiliate account with no loss on the player side. Thats why it is in the affiliate T&Cs. Not all affiliates are genuine (even though we would all like to think they are). This is why I am disagreeing with the post that I said I was disagreeing with… I guess that point was not made clear by me?As I said, you do have a unique situation there – and you must prohibit that by exercising the clause in the player T&Cs. If prohibited and closed at the player level, it has zero affect on the affiliate. Thus it should not be considered an affiliate issue, even if the affiliate happens to know the player.
My point is that you can cut it off at an earlier junction and thus you should do that, rather than leaving it to the affiliate employees to manage.
Your other term is perfectly fine – but as I mention in the post to Schalk above, the net result for the casino is the same whether it’s me, my brother, my dad, my dog, or Joe Schmoe that loses the money to the casino. However I wouldn’t consider this term particularly problematic anyhow, as the reasoning is quite clear.
