Patronising? If having the correct analysis of numbers being pointed out to you feels that way then so be it. I’ll live with it.
You have a 400% bonus casino (LuckyRed) that pays 400% credits.
That’s NOT being shafted (despite your assertion in the LuckyRed numbers post that it was).
As YOU hadn’t made the connection I mentioned it.
Regarding the other numbers it seems that credits are around 60-80% of deposits – again it’s in line with what the casino advertises on it’s banners with a 100% bonus.
As I recall Gambling Wages used a category called “manager credits” to boost the credits way above the carded rate when compared to deposits.
With these numbers that you posted it seems that bonus credits are being paid in line with advertising – both at LuckyRed and a CWC Casinos as a whole … so where is the shafting?
What is the ligitimate issue?