Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Reply To: CAP Certified Partners – open discussion

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
#794528
paolo
Member
Simmo!;196521 wrote:
Whatever it’s called, I think it needs to take into account the properties themselves – the casinos/poker rooms etc – and how they treat players. I know CAP is affiliate focused, but IMO it’s misleading to “certify” or “approve” an affiliate program when the casinos themselves mistreat players. Aside from the ethical side, it doesn’t help affiliates either as they won’t retain players.

This +1. The programs that have notable amount of real public complaints should not be “certified” or “approved” in the first place and new operators should not be “certified” before they have been online for like 1 year or so, so that they have proved to be reputable and not produce player or affiliate complaints.

Operators that would like to get certified and which have not been around long enough / have had player complaints in the past could be put to something like “pending approval” list for public monitoring. This should produce good results since they’d have to focus on treating players and affiliates well so that they could get certified after certain amount of time.

And then if already certified programs produce either player or affiliate complaints, they should be de-certified and penalized more heavily. If I’d own this site, I had already de-certified a program that produces so much complaints in like two months time that they end up to casinomeisters player warning list already.