Adding to the original discussion, I think it’s fair to add that BCP replied to say that they interpreted my email regarding not sending more traffic as a request to close my account, apologised, and re-opened it. I’m not sure if they still intend to continue to pay me existing revenues but will no doubt find out next month.
@GamTrak 176631 wrote:
NOPE, absolutely not. New affiliates do not know that CAP certification is not an endorsement and will fall victim to them. Our goal should be to protect the industry not the casinos.
They need to earn their way (if possible) back by taking out the term and paying up the money they owe to affiliates.
OK, this is realy a whole seperate discussion, but the problem is IMO that while Certification does open up a communication channel which is a good thing, even with the less scrutible operators, but as you suggest Gamtrak can in some cases give a false impression.
The answer IMO, something maybe Warren and Lou will consider, is to have a secondary level called “Sponsor”, which could be charged the same as Certified, where it is made clear to new affiliates that Sponsors are promoted at an affiliate’s own risk, but still gives the program a forum etc.
Then, after X time of good behaviour, certification becomes an option. This may also actually increase the scope for CAP revenues too, which could benefit us all.
Bonusstreak: Prize money? You’re confusing me (again) 
Cheers
Simmo!