Cpays might have changed their ways …
But let’s face it that’s a direction that comes from the top level – and is then controlled and supported by management.
The re-branding and appearnce of a few good AM’s does not mean anything – apart from an acknowledgement from that comapny that the old image was far too tarnished to ever improve (as mentioned by posters above).
So, has the top level ownership changed? Has the corporate goal changed?
I don’t think so – so I don’t believe an any real change.
Perhaps in three of four years, when I hear from long-term affiliates that they’ve been dealing with Cpays withou6t issue then I’ll consider a re-evaluation.
But not three to four months after a re-branding and PR exercise.
:wink-wink