I just re-read the entire “article” again and there are a few more points I found disturbing also:
1. While we arent hiding, I didnt think a public listing of the officers in our company without our consent was necessary or desirable. I can’t speak for Lyceum, but I doubt the directors of their parent company would be amused either. How did this add to the “fun” aspect of the spoof?
2. At CAP we never discuss private meetings we may have had in public. This is a basic rule of business and to do so is very poor decorum. Discussing meetings they may have had with Warren publically without our consent was very objectionable. How did this add “fun” to the spoof?
After this I will step out of the conversation as I don’t want to “over read” what this spoof really was. Also I genuinely like Michael and GPWA and dont think this “joke” was meant to cause hard feelings or damage to the relationship.