@kwblue 137752 wrote:
B4 is here when they are the 1 organization that could quickly drain a lot of our income. And they could do it ALL with BH affiliates.
This worries me too.
The fact that B4 is affiliating only with ethically-challenged groups is a concern. These are the groups that look the other way when BH activity occurs. Groups that have historically treated their affiliates like shit.
Why isn’t B4 partnered up with CWC or CPS or Rewards?
Could it be that the ethical standards of CWC, CPS, Rewards, etc. are too high? Did B4 intentionally pick slimy outfits that would look the other way if BH activity occurs?
I’m pretty much opposed to anything that financially helps the rogue Playtechs, 888, Party, Sportingbet, etc. I’d love to see them all put out of business. These groups give the industry a bad reputation, and they hurt fellow affiliates (friends in some cases), and that pisses me off.
My personal philosophy is that I think everyone should work with ethical, affiliate friendly groups, in order to better the industry as a whole. In the long run this is the smart thing to do. Helping Cpays and other trash groups conflicts with this idea; these groups only hurt the industry.
I think rev share is better than CPA (as do most affiliates), and I hate to see newbies duped into CPA deals, because ultimately they will earn far less than they could have with rev share. (With casinos, anyway). Maybe I should just look out for #1 from now on, and quit worrying about who takes CPA deals. I don’t like the thought of that, though; I’d rather help out and make friends along the way. Such a phenomenal industry this is; everyone is a competitor, yet we share info and help each other out…
Anyway, all of that said — I do understand Prof’s point about CAP being a business, needing to feed families, pay bills, etc.
At the same time, I know there are people out there (me included) who could potentially be financially affected as a result of BH activity. 