Similar things as as been pointed out.
But slightly more ordered – the first three things relate t the company and operations itself – and have to be squeaky clean before we continue on.
(1) Corporate structure.
(financial reputation, longevity in field, licenses held)
(2) Player feedback in forums
( complaints, deposit / payout issues, support issues )
(3) Affiliate feedback in CAP, GPWA, iGAMI
(payment issues, lack of contact)
Then I’ll look at these two things to see whether they have an edge for players and are at least are up with the market for affiliates.
(4) Player benefits
( Rake and payout percentages, odds lines, bonus offers )
(5) Competitive commission structure.
It’s surprising how few of the offerings out there actually pass through the five criteria.
:huh2: