AmCan wrote:
…federal prosecutors love to set examples and get on television.
I would normally agree with you 100%, but I don’t think the Feds really want too many public eyes on this case. Industry eyes, yes… but not public eyes.
So much for David’s right to a speedy (almost a year since his arrest) and public (almost no coverage by media other than a few newspapers) trial, by an impartial jury (in St. Louis, Missouri? Ya right…) of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed (do I even have to go into this?)…
But silly me… we can’t just start throwing things like law and the constitution into the governments case… :rolleyes: