Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Reply To: BetUs indicted for processing charges?

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
#736903
Anonymous
Inactive

I relayed what I was told.

And all I said was that you were told wrong.

Do you have a copy of the actual indictment so I can review it for accuracy? I have not seen the actual court doc.

Yes, the link is above.

If you are going to say Gambling911.com stopped using thier odds wouldnt it make sense to at least go over there and check before you make that statement?

http://www.gambling911.com/Blake-Lewis-American-Idol-051407.html
http://www.gambling911.com/Spider-Man-3-Box-Office-051307.html

And there are a few others, not yet changed. Gambling911 can advertise Cpays for what I care, but when a long time advertiser starts changing their primary odds provider, is usually for a reason. I do have the Gambling911 original article about the indictment, which later own was replaced by one not mentioning BETUS at all. And that’s why I said what I said. There are a few other portals which wrote about the indictment, but conviniently omitted the BETUS from their articles. Unlike others, I do not speak using she-said-he-said information and I do check before I post, especially when millions of people’s money, including mine, are at stake.