And to be honest, I just can’t follow your math, it makes no sense to me. You are basing them on casinos having large fluctuations of $ made per unit played, and that is not so. It’s not like sports.
If that was the case that “the payout rate is the same” and all casinos make cash all the time then you would NOT need to worry about no negatives clauses or bundling clauses?
What is the fuss about then ?
:lookaroun
Of course we know that’s not the case – and I’ve read your own posts plenty of times on the drawbacks of bundling and negatives being rolled over … to the point of saying that you drop anyone who does this.
I assumed that was because you found it affected your bottom line and that casinos do lose from time to time. Wasn’t it?
on the other hand, ….. an aff taking such a loss has no such large numbers to absorb the loss.
I understand that – and the answer has to be to diversify into multiple areas and multiple groups.
Being an affiliate these days is almost like investing in the stock market – taking different mediums like sports, poker, casino, bingo, backgammon all from different groups in order to get best returns.
Indeed diversifying into non-gambling is also prudent – but finding a market that is as lucrative is the stumbling block … (let me know if you do)
:tounge2: