CPA deals nearly always cause hassles don’t they?
IF the casino doesn’t get the value they expect from players then there is often a claim of publisher fraud …
If the publisher is being paid then it usually means that the casino is getting far more value for money – and a rev share deal would have been better anyway.
=====
In this specific case …
From what I’ve seen of Mr Enrique on CAP – I’d say that casino.dk is top notch and not likely to be remotely interested in this small time fraud …
:thumbsup:
But spectragames may not have had the benefit of seeing that – and may also have dealt with many cases that seemed similar and were fraudulent — and lets face it we can find 1000 sites on the web that’s would obviously rip off their grandmother for $100 …
:omg:
=====
I’ve had one experience myself (when dealing with 888.con) of being kicked out of a CPA deal after 3 months when they were happy for the first two months … and they also used the F-R-A-U-D word and inferred it was my fault.
Let’s just say that I’ll have nothing to do with that #@$%% @!#$#$ @#@$#@$@$$ company even if they’re the last online place left on Earth !!
:bouncer:
It’s not the ending of the deal that matters as that’s a valid client business decison at any time with CPA …… it’s the reneging on an agreement and then the subsequent accusations. It really does get affiliates angry.
It’s the world-wide-web for goodness sake – I have no idea who has clicked on the links – I get 150,000 visits a month and don’t know all of them !!!
(err – sorry getting worked up again)
:roflmao:
=====
The two sides will never agree here (I know from my personal experience above) and public debate will probably not solve anything.
But I also know that this is an affiliate forum and I’ll take the experience onboard regarding another CPA failure – and unforunately for Spectragames I’ll know that you saw $690 as more important than keeping to your word.
That was a poor value choice in my opinion … I would have thought that your reputation was worth more than that.
:plain: