You mean will I consider the possibility that you alone got the correct answer while every single mathematician on the planet who’s looked at blackjack got it wrong? That kind of prospect requires that you provide some compelling evidence for your position, and to date you haven’t provided any.
In any event, I’ve told you from the get-go that I’m willing to give your idea proper consideration in the most appropriate way: A wager on actual hands played to see which way wins more money. But you won’t agree to put your strategy to the test. THAT ALONE is the dead giveaway that your strategy idea is worthless. If YOU won’t stand behind your own idea, why should anyone else believe it?
Then you’ve just demonstrated how badly you misunderstand my position. I’ve been explaining REPEATEDLY that it behooves us to listen to people who know what they’re talking about. Between the two of us, you’re the one who’s ignoring expert opinion. Me, I would listen to Einstein. Just as I listened to experts like Michael Shackleford, Edward Thorp, Peter Griffin, Stanford Wong. But you’re not listening to anybody but yourself. It means nothing to you that NO OTHER MATHEMATICIAN ON THE PLANET agrees with you.
I could change your quote a bit and say to you, “If a horde of professional mathematicians came here to prove me right you still wouldn’t believe it.” Because in effect that’s already happened. You already know that every expert in existence disagrees with you. But amazingly, that doesn’t even make you *wonder* whether you might be wrong. Wow.