Only one thing is obvious here
Michael has no math skills, or is keeping them cleverly hidden, but can throw reference at several people who have attempted to beat the odds and failed.
Nolan has basic math skills but cannot understand some things no matter how obvious they are, just admit that you don’t know how to figure out the correct odds for 2 handed play, if you do, put em up, don’t give me this roughly, approximately stuff, put up the exact odds, you repeat in saying that your return will be the same whether you have 2 hands drawing on a 10 vs the dealers 6, or 4 hands with a 10 drawing vs the dealers 6, how is this possible, you have 4 favourites vs 1 underdog in one situation, it’s not 4 favourites vs 1 underdog in 4 seperate 1 on 1 situations.
If it were an elimination fight where one fighter is fighting 4 other fighters, each of whom would be favoured in a 1 on 1 situation vs him, how many times would the one underdog fighter be able to beat all 4, 3, 2, or 1 of them.
Obviously the underdog fighter has a much better chance vs only 2 fighters at once, opposed to 4, yet you fail to realize that.
This is a nowhere conversation and it’s over
You guys go and kick that casino’s ass with your formula ok, if they wanna bar you for excessive winning call me, i’ll straighten them out.