I just want to make one last correction with my math, as Darko pointed out, that 6.72 figure was my bad, since i forgot i had already split once to get the 0.64 total, and already had 2 hands, causing me to over multiply one number, the 6.72 should be 3.36, then divided by 4, and the 1.4 is divided by 2.
The actual roi figure for 2 handed play is this
Standing 0.70
Splitting 0.84
What i find bad business practice is that michael and most likely his pal nolan, are employees of the wizard of odds, and the whole time they were taking shots at me without even realizing i was using the very same odds formula they were using, except that i had adjusted it for 2 handed play.
What was also very bad practice was that instead of coming here and taking shots, they could’ve just listed the correct odds formula for 2 handed play, or at least make it available on their site somewhere, if they knew it.
As a result i have lost major respect for the wizard, and i am certain that they didn’t invent the calculating odds formula over there, but just put it on the web, yet they act like they did, it was most likely invented 100+ years ago by someone like me trying to beat the house.
Overall, I thought you guys gave a rather poor account of yourselves, and Michael’s attempts to get a fellow webmaster banned from an affiliate community for disagreeing with him were truly pathetic and shameful.
And now it’s time to leave you all for a while, the numbers are right, you can debate them all you want. In 2 handed play, using the example hand from page 1, splitting will return 14% more money than standing.