Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Reply To: CWC negative carry over rules

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
#716340
Anonymous
Inactive

I’m with Dom on that one. I can see why negative carry-over is used, and I don’t have a problem with it personally – it’s more important that the casino is reputable IMO. But like Dom, I would tend to de-prioritise a neg carry-over property when I’m down – it’s just a sensible business move to send a player where I can earn from them.

The $3k per week cashout rule aside (which is not an issue for most low-rollers anyway), I’ve liked what I’ve seen so far.