You couldn’t pay for a better opinion than Prof. Rose either…
Here is the column:
http://www.gamblingandthelaw.com/columns/2006_act.htm
This is his opinion on the matter as has been quoted on this forum in a different thread already:
The greatest danger here would seem to be with affiliates. Any American operator can be easily grabbed. This includes sites that don’t directly take bets, but do refer visitors to gaming sites. If the affiliate is paid for those referrals by receiving a share of the money wagered or lost, it would not be difficult to charge the affiliate with violating this law, under the theory of aiding and abetting. Being a knowing accomplice and sharing in the proceeds of a crime make the aider and abettor guilty of the crime itself. The federal government could also charge the affiliate with conspiracy to violate this new Act.