I know it certainly doesn’t look like if you’ve got your revshare model thinking cap on, but you can easily just work it backwards to get the average deposit amount:
$200 earned / 35% = ~ 570+ deposited…. I know the $16k can be a shocker depending on the gametype, but if you spend a couple of seconds with you wager model hat on it will be easy to understand 
Remember, the wagering grows very fast and is not the deposit amount.
Ryan, thanks for the basic math lesson and belittleling my original post by suggesting (2x) that I dress more appropriately and if I did then I wouldn’t have a problem with the rev share system.
If you weren’t so quick with your condescending comments you would see my post wasn’t a question about doing the math it was about seeing deposit amounts in the stats. Like the comment in the post by M.D. says “One must be blind to think those who complain fail to understand the new model and that’s why they complain.” If I do have a problem with the math it is I just don’t like the math. It is the same math I see month after month.
To me, at it’s most basic feature, seeing deposits in the stats is about fairness. It is something we, as affiliates, have expected from the programs we have joined. Anytime I have joined an affilate program I do like most affiliates, I scrutinize their terms, stat structure and other things in order to make a determination if it is a program I want to be a part of. I can’t remember ever coming across a program with a ‘no deposits in stats’ policy. If I had it would be a no-brainer to me.
There are other reasons why seeing deposits can be important, as both Goldfinger and BonusGeek have both succinctly pointed out in their posts. After reading these posts I think most affilates will agree that ‘deposit stats’ are VERY relevant.