opiemarket wrote:
Sorry J. Todd…I think the perception is accurate in this case…
Your point is not is dispute, Jamie. He said what he said, and he feels what he feels.
:blush:
I just meant that he could have communicated his feelings in a better way… and he knows that. It’s true that things need to be set right, but it would be a shame to let this destroy CAC…
If it does, then the DOJ will have succeeded in a backwards sort of way. I just want what’s best for this business, and I believe CAC is a big part of that. We are at a very critical time in this industry… we need to find a way to unite and not fragment.