Hi Ryan
Thanks for the response. With due respect I can’t agree. A player in that situation is likely to be disillusioned by the limiting cashout policy and go elsewhere. At least as a player, that’s what I’d do if I encontered that rule. Even if the “case for the defence” is that it encourages them to play it back by limiting what they receive, then that isn’t something I’d advocate.
I know this is only an opinion and there is a business to run, but I think it’s far more important if you are going to encourage players to stick around to understand each individual’s players needs.
I don’t mean to be confrontational, but as an affiliate, I’d much rather have a player go to a casino where they are not limited by rules such as this because I think, treated properly, they will stay loyal for longer.
Just my opinion 
Cheers
Simmo!