You probably not going to like this, I’m sorry, but seeing I’m playing the devils advocate, from your stand point Dom there may well not be any conflict of interest or add to that any form of pre-meditated vested interest either.
Unless you can state 100% void of any doubt, that no one who has visited the eCogra site and has then visited your site, (via the reputable portal links page) followed by signing up to a gaming property and depositing, which in turn you’ve received financial gain from, like it or not, admit to it or not, this in essence is a vested interest and maybe also be viewed as a conflict of interest too.
Yes you did, yes you are and I’ve never questioned your commitment to the 888 issues. In fact if you peruse my postings you’ll see a definate ‘pat on the back’ attitude shinning thru. Besides if I didn’t feel you were performing a sartorial effort, I sure as hell wouldn’t be linking to your 888.com page.
Hence your statement above leaves me scratching my head as to why you’d post it in this context.
Unless of course your using this as some quasi justified reason as to why I or others should cut you some slack on the eCogra/vested/conflict issue.
It may not be a problem to you Dom, but it’s still an issue.
At a guess, I’d say from what’s transpired over the favouritism shown by eCogra to 888.com. this very well explains why your link as well as others are listed in the first place.
Maybe, however, if eCogra chooses to act in the manner that it has (and on your own admission your going after 888.com) and in doing so lends itself to align with bias activities, then I for one would certainly hope that you did hold a BIG problem with this.
Admitting that you don’t imo only goes to encourage trust issues being raised.