Online Casino

[Anonymous]

Chatmaster wrote:

Wager2winUK You are a difficult person to please

Actually I’m not, though in these matters my standards are highly set

IMO this industry for too long has been permitted to hold conflict of interests, which in most cases are neither addressed nor challenged. I would hope that in voicing my sincere concerns regarding these issues, they’d be seen by those who also hold passion to the gaming industry as constructive criticisms to the betterment of this industry on a whole.

Granted each one of us may be construed as holding some form of vested interest in this industry, be this as a player, affiliate webmaster or any other number of possibilities. Still, it’s my belief that ethical, just and fair behaviour should prevail and in doing so sit squarely on this industries shoulders.

Chatmaster wrote:

Well as far as PriceWaterhouseCoopers are concerned, you cannot ask for a more neutral organization to get involved. By auditing and questioning the personnel allot will be revealed as far as the intentions, operations and mistakes are concerned. It will actually make it very difficult for JF to hide anything and get to the root of the problem. I believe eCOGRA has made a good decision here. They are ensuring that their decision processes are as unbiased as it possibly can be.

In so far as my views towards PWC I don’t have a personal issue with them or disbelieve that they would not perform their duties to a 100% capacity.

I do however feel that under the current climate, it would have been a wise alternative to opt for a totally disconnected, un-associated Company (there are others that could perform this duty as competently as PWC) that holds no ties to this industry.