If I am reading Ryans post correctly am I to understand that if a player deposits $100 and plays Blackjack, that in order for me to make a true 35% $35 on that $100 deposit that the player needs to wager that $100 deposit $7,936. I know the numbers come from pwc and all, but being a gambler myself it is hard to believe that I can make a $100 deposit last that long unless I am one of the 1 in 100 that gets the hot streak. That is assuming I just play $5 a hand blackjack perfect strategy, then it would take the computer almost 1600 hands to beat me out of that $100.
I am not saying it is wrong, its just hard to believe. It’s just in all my experience in online gambling, sure once in a blue moon I have gotten those hot streaks, but I can remember a WHOLE lot more bad streaks where the casino gobbled up my money like there was no tommorow and I was lucky if I rolled the money 5 times let alone 79.
So I am not sure what to think. I try to be as fair as possible, but I call it like I see it. I may dump a $100 into a micro casino and play some blackjack to see how long it takes before I am bust. I know one test won’t tell me much, but if it gobbles my money like I am used to, then I will at least see what I can expect with this program under the worst case scenario.