webber286 wrote:
It’s just a silly assertion that you can pass a ban a $12Billion industry (with a 
and expect it to just go away. It’s funny that the prohibition guy kept saying it was illegal today. If that is the case, then what is the purpose of this bill. Very odd arguement that ensued. Neither really stated their case very well.
and expect it to just go away. It’s funny that the prohibition guy kept saying it was illegal today. If that is the case, then what is the purpose of this bill. Very odd arguement that ensued. Neither really stated their case very well.
I was disappointed with the misleading inuendos from the opposer. Also, I do feel the poker (and casino) industry could of had a better argument than the one that was presented. I agree with webber286 that it was a very odd argument because, YES, if it is ALREADY illegal than why do you need a new bill of any kind!? :confused: