Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Reply To: Casino Rewards True Wager is awful for affiliates. Here’s why!

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
#689652
Anonymous
Inactive

I have to agree with Xgambler. There is a lot more behind wager share, I personally think affiliates are eventually going to see that they are getting short-handed eventually but it will be to late, although some affiliates will make more on wagershare. You have to think about it in the long run, I don’t have many players but the ones I do have are of fantastic quality, and I can tell you I had one player who lost $500 but I got a nice heafty comission of $8.00, of course you could have a player that deposits $50 and ends up wagering 40k, but do the math it’s more likely the high-roller player will lose his $500 versus stretching out some poor guys 50 bucks The bottom line is your players are going to lose everything eventually in the long run anyways. I don’t see why affiliates are so scared of have a negative month it is all a part of the game, you have to realize casinos would not exist if they did not have winners, and they would also not exist if they did not eventually get the players money, so why short change yourself? Do you really think an affiliate program is going to change from a well known earnings model if there wasn’t something in it for them? I doubt it. Overall I think wagershare is a fine earnings model, it works but it’s for people that can’t stomach any negative variance although it’s much better than CPA deals. I mean why else would they not allow both earning models to be used? They allow affiliates to keep all of there old players on rev. share but they don’t allow anyone to add new players to it. All of the big programs going to wagershare should allow both models to be used, if it is supposedly a less profitible model why are they pushing so hard to get rid of it? They should be happy affiliates are opting for a pay-cut, think about it. Over the last year everyone is trying to trim the affiliates comission check this is just another way it’s just thought out much better. I also see that this wagershare could be a problem for bonus hustlers, affiliates will still get paid on those players even though they put the casino in hole. It will suffer the same as a CPA deal, rev. share is the only way an affiliate gets paid when the casino gets paid and everyone stays happy. Rev. Share is the only true partnership program because everyone wins together and everyone loses together. So please FA and Casino Rewards please let us have at least the option to be on Rev. Share.