Integrity wrote:
Yea, probably…
And if I was too specific no one would participate…
Or someone else would say it was too complicated…
Anyway… sorry to have wasted your time.
Now due to the blandness of the internet I can’t tell wither you’re being sarcastic, sulky, or straight forward with that comment. I’m sure it’s one of those 3 .. but I just can’t tell.
:lookaroun
Apologies if you’re feeling picked on – it wasn’t the intent – I was simply trying to get a feeling as to how to rate “healthy and steady income”.
Generally, though if you are looking for a “poll for statistical information” then it should be “specific” shouldn’t it?
I’ve voted but I just don’t know how much help it will be …