Sue is absolutly right, from a tech point this is just total BS. What RB is doing is after 6 months of no activity they are moving the player account from the Aff’s account into a house account.
In todays world if a player joins another casino or opens a new account that goes to the new aff that caused this to take place and that is fair so RB is not giving anything back to the pool they are just taking from the Aff and putting it into their account.
Lets list the FACTS so we can see what is taking place:
1. RB changes the original contract to take back inactive players.
2. RB reduces payouts percentage to 20%.
3. RB does not pay out on first deposit thereby stealling from AFF.
4. RB increases it’s direct marketing campaign by sendining out their own magazines thereby sidestepping any aff payments.
5. RB has presence at SEO show during all this upheaval further showing their desire to be their own marketing company rather than using the AFFs that got them here.
6. RB increases direct mail campaign to players to get them under a house account now that the 6 month rule is in place.
Add it up and RB wants to side step the affs and run their own marketing department. Take down your banners folks, and let’s see how well they do on our side of the fence.
Sorry but this just pisses me off, although I like that Zane used the phrase “paradigm shift” I don’t know if that has ever been used on this board.
Brian