besides, the majority of us either don’t have the money, inclination, or for that matter confidence (that it would be worth the trouble even if we won) to pursue such avenues.
Lets stick to sticking together and run these warning lists in very high profile places.
**********
on a sadder note; it sounds like we will have to do just that. Another of our members just told me they had decided not to change; and lets put it this way, I trust the source enough to go ahead and start making the necessary arrangements to get RB casinos added to my warning list which I’ve already got up on several sites and now it looks as if I will have to put it on all of them.
you know one has to wonder if this doesn’t involve ego to some point because I just can’t see how any of these places think they are going to keep climbing when they’ve
1. lost their best source,… almost their only source of new faces.
2. will have (if everyone I think participates does) a very big NEGATIVE ad campaign, one unlike which the online gambling world has ever seen, this includes newsletters, front page exposure, and I imagine a few will even go as far as creating a “riverbelle casino sucks” page or something like that for SEO purposes – basically turning every possible avenue of any kind of support to proving how credible they are: except of course for their magazine (ya right! people will beleive they’re credible because the magazine THEY put out says so).
well I guess no sense pointing all that out again. …sorry.
okay, can we get a unified agreement to perhaps run a front page warning list?
that will be felt most effectively and faster than any thing else.
why I’d imagine they will be able to visibly see the drop-off not only in new players, and traffic; but when the players see those warnings, they’ll disappear too.
I wish it wasn’t so; but I stand ready to launch.
I just need the official word they’re going to be stupid about this and I’ll get started.