after some consideration I’ve decided that Dom is right. that as long as they’ve taken out the retroactive thing; that they’ve really done nothing illegal, but that at the same time they are under the new terms no longer a profitable group of casinos to promote.
so as it stands now, to avoid being associated with casinos that probably are going to be on a lot of blacklists; and because they are no longer an affiliate program which is going to prove profitable for the reasons of the new terms, and because they’re going to lose so much in reputation and I don’t want to be dragged down with them,
I’m going to remove their links but as long as they don’t do any retroactive changes past the one we let them get away with; then I will not add them to the blacklist.
I will however be putting them into a section that says a warning to players that if they stop playing at these casinos for any period longer than 6 months, then their accounts will be erased from being under me, and therefore I have no further incentive to guarantee they’ll get paid from these casinos.
In other words, as I always try to do; I’ll call ’em as I see ’em. Be totally honest with the surfers and let them decide.
I’m holding off on that section a few more days however in hopes that RB will come to its senses and make the few little tweaks in these new terms that would prove they are serious about being a good partner.
why is it so hard to give in on these as you put it: matters which will not effect affs for the most part anyway?
there is nothing more frustrating than seeing another party sink your ship (and of course: their ship as well) and not being able to do anything to stop it … when its so damn unnecessary!