Please keep in mind that the Classic Commission already contains a term which was made retroactive – the “one player per month” clause was recently added and NOT agreed to.
When you remove that, then we will call that the Classic Commission.
Also:
Quote:
This is not a retro-active change. We know that if a Customer has not purchased nor played for an extended period of 6 consecutive months, there is no chance that they will return to the casino. On the positive side, should you manage to re-active this customer, you will earn commission as per the Casino Commission Model that you are on.
If you know there is no chance that a player will return to the casino, why in the world do you even put this clause in the contract? What if, on the offchance, someone was on vacation for six months, then comes back?
Please remove this totally unacceptable clause.
These are the two I am watching right now. Others are bring up the other problems and I will let them continue along that vein for now until I have seen that you are willing to treat affiliates properly by fixing these two problems first.