They have in the terms the generic coverall note of “we can change the aff terms and if you don’t like it, then terminate the agreement”..
Business is business though and these firms are not playing the game with anything like evenhandedness. The demeanour is reprehensible. Why am I babbling on about demeanour etc?
Because I see talk of “the casino is not the same as the aff firm”, ## ~ so the casino keeps it’s good name?
Lol.
I trust the casinos will “evenhandedly with the correct demeanour” enter the chamber to insist on dialogue, or they are rogue. That costs money, in the end.
They(whoever they think they are) will talk, in the end.