Get exclusive CAP network offers from top brands

View CAP Offers

Reply To: Cloaking/Black Hat/Page Hijacking etc etc

[bsa_pro_ad_space id=2]
#668389
Anonymous
Inactive
croupier wrote:
Vetting sites only assures that one of a webmasters sites is up to standard, he could have dozens of others redirecting to the casino via the vetted site and unless the casino personaly spots one of the other sites then it’s pointless.

If an aff prog actively pursues quality control after the initial vetting (ie. they follow up an any complaints about a non-vetted site) then it would work to a certain degree – but just initial vetting is pointless.

But lets face it, even those affs who obey all the rules could get rejected – many of the so called good sites are simply banner farms with a pretty face lift and offer no real original content.

Hmmm. Well I know of programs that actually do vet any new sites added to your portfolio within a program before allowing you to generate creatives for them.

Yes it generates more work. But on this board people are complaining about scraper sites, copyright infringement, search engine spamming ( Yes this is an underhand technique and does get you banned from the search engines after a short period of time ), generating banner farms and landing pages to turn up high in the search engines as a result.

With the problems the casino industry is facing in the US in particular as well as other territories, wouldn’t it be good for all of us if we could help regulate the industry and improve it’s overall standing in areas where gambling online is frowned upon.

Or do we take the option of, we can’t beat them, so we will join them attitude?