Spearmaster wrote:
….certain determinations corrected (ie. a particular well-known casino, in fact probably many of those named, being called “illegal” when in fact they reside in legal jurisdictions and operate legally),….
……..
I do know that there is a lot of stuff in there which is present solely for the purpose of influencing the court, not because it is actually correct.Agreed. I couldn’t believe how many times I saw the phrase “illegal website” or “illegal casino.” Sorry guys, but repeating something over and over again doesn’t make it a fact. Hopefully the court won’t be influenced by the abundance of false statements.