As I stated on the original thread, this has long been a thorn in my side. Makes no sense to require i.d. when sending winnings.
Makes every bit of sense to verify i.d. before allowing a player to play – even if it waiting to play turns some of them off, it would undoubtedly increase players’ trust and pay off in the long run.
That is messed up.
Problem seems to be that there is precious little forsight in this business. Too many are in too big a hurry to grab money to think ahead and plan for the long term.
As for BB1’s treatment by an affiliate group he has been representing, that’s intollerable. Those of us who are responsible webmasters and back up the casinos we promote need to know that the affiliate managers are on our side, and will be there for us should we need to troubleshoot situations between our players and the casinos.