CAP doesn’t approve s#!tty programs
all CAP can be expected to do is to be sure to NOT approve programs that are proven to not pay; or are proven to be cheats.
As long as there is selective shaving; CAP cannot and should not be held accountable for policing approved programs from this practice.
Hell there’s no way it could.
So that leaves CAP with the little choice but to do the right and honorable thing; which it does. It approves programs that have not been proven to be cheats.
Thats all that can be expected. CAP’s job is NOT to be the police of the OG niche.
I think it is commendable that CAP does as much as it does; and I point out that I recently visited the powerbet site which proudly displays the “approved by the gpwa” logo on its aff site.
I think the comparison speaks for itself.
Lou has done all that should be expected, and more; to weed out the worst of the worst. You can’t expect this site to do any more for the very reasons you mentioned. With nearly all programs; there are at least a few people who do well with them.
That deserves the benefit of doubt.
So I’m not saying CAP lists shitty programs. Quite the opposite. It shouldn’t be expected to held responsible for the ethics of the programs it approves; but rather should be expected to NOT list programs known to be suspect.
IMHO.
*************
sorry, I posted this as Prof was posting. he covers most of what I said.
********
Note- powerbet may be a quality aff program at this point in time; I cannot say; but I do know at one time they were very suspect.