Hmm.. I have also thought about the fact that we could make money even if casino isn’t and that’s because of the no negative carryover, but what amazes me is that affiliates seem to take it granted that a JACKPOT WIN is counted towards the negative balance as it obviously shouldn’t – at least not in my opinion. Now as I see the progressives is that the money won in the Jackpot is not casinos money and it has not been taken away from the casino as it is cumulated by players playing that very game so why on earth should affiliates suffer from the Jackpot wins players receive??
Originally posted by arkyt
Example: 45% planYou have a big winner that hits a jackpot of 10,000 – which puts you in the red. If that negative were carried over and the player lost 5000 the following month you would still be 5000 in the hole.
If the negative was not carried over you would make $2250 if the player lost back half the next month.
This is why some programs utilize negative carry overs. They dont want to payout 10,000 – then turn around and pay you 2250 the following month when the player loses 5000. The casino would then be losing as they see it – a total of 7250 (5000 to the player and 2250 to the affiliate.)
When you think about the scale of things – paying the affiliate a percentage is the best choice! Considering that scale – I would surmise that programs using carry overs are not that big, are having financial problems, or are just freaking greedy!
:cheers: :sheers: :cheers:
Drink up boyxz