“Can you tell me why is my site not accepted.”
No, but I can guess. That is all this is, is a guess…
First, are you sure you were rejected and not just still sitting there waiting?
Second, you mask your links (put cursor over a link shows bullshit rather than link destination). That likely won’t get your site rejected, but nobody wants to click blind links so you’ll likely get a less in-depth review.
Third, I just clicked through Riverbelle, Wiilliam Hill US, Royal Dice, Omni and found no reviews. You might want to separate casinos into “have reviews” and “waiting for first review”. How many links will an editor clickthrough that show no reviews before giving up, ten? Less? Make it easy on ’em.
Fourth, I click “View report” and nothing happens. If this is supposed to pop up a javascript thing, then you are running uphill against IE6 and some firewalls. It’s very unlikely an editor in gambling (or porn) is going to not have high security settings on their computer given how much malicious code is out there. On the other hand, if those links work for no one, then that is a big negative against the site. The editing guidelines say that sites under construction should not be edited.
Fifth, the reviews that are there are pretty minimal. Casino Tropez is just three sentences.
The site mostly just repeats the content that can be found on the casino sites themselves, all the “more info” stuff. I don’t see any 500+ word reviews.
The other site is listed I imagine because of pages like
http://www.bonustracker.com/best-online-slots.php
http://www.bonustracker.com/best-casino-payouts.php
http://www.bonustracker.com/online-poker-guide.php
Not a ton of stuff on this site, but three pages alone seem to have more webmaster-written original content than your site, and all the links work. The site fits the category description:
http://dmoz.org/Games/Gambling/Guides/Reviews/desc.html
It says right there “lists of casino features” will not be listed. That is the bulk of your site. While that is useful, they already list that by listing Casino Tropez or William Hill themselves. Also I think “Reviews” is just a convenient word for “Consumer Information”. So, I think bonustracker does qualify to be considered for this category. I don’t know that it deserves to be listed, but bonustracker does qualify to be considered for this category.
I’d suggest you get at least twenty original reviews of 500+ words and submit again. This should be about the easiest category to get in. That’s all you have to do is write some actual reviews of the casinos. But while this category should be easy to get into, the amount of sites out there pretending to offer online casino “reviews” is enormous. How many portal type sites out there have bullshit “reviews” that are nothing but copying the promotional text of the casinos? Thousands. You have to be different than the pack. At least ten reviews of 300+ words would seem to me to be a bare minimum here.