Its generally agreed that true “bonus abusers” are a problem for casinos and affiliates alike. I dont have a problem with trying to minimize “bonus abuse” or discourage bonus abusers from playing at a particular casino property.
But if the terms and conditions are too broad and totally subjective then would/could casinos take advantage of the situation and refuse to pay players who have won by accusing them of bonus abuse? I think excesses can be rightly claimed on both sides.
Many Casinos are setting rediculous play through requirements so they virtually never have to pay out winnings. They are well aware that if the ratio of play is set high enough then a player has very little chance of leaving the casino a winner.
Does this make the CASINO a bonus abuser too? Are they not using the bonus as an enticement to new players when THEY have no real intention of paying any of that bonus “money” out?
Is fairness when it comes to bonuses a two way street?