@Slotland_Affiliates 242550 wrote:
I agree with both things you say, rmeeuwsen.
Many players simply won’t ever bother reading bonus offer details no matter how you serve it. And at least to a player inside me the lower wagering requirements matter almost equally – if not even more – than the bonus amount itself. In other words I’d rather take $50 with 10x, than $100 with +20x play through.
But a lot of folks just won’t do their math
Yes, it seems to be just basic common sense. There is no high math computation involved either. Using your two brands as an example, there is:
Win A Day – Max. Bonus $500 with 10x bonus and 1x deposit wagering requirments.
Slotland – Max. Bonus $1,000 with 12x bonus and 1x deposit wagering requirments.
Wouldn’t the smart bonus hunter first grab the $500 bonus and then the $1,000 bonus? Both seem to be the lowest x around with decent $.