@arkyt 242381 wrote:
Amazing after all these years a readily available definition for “bonus abuse” still doesn’t exist – eh? IMO the best fitting one might “often used excuse giving persmission to the casino to rob the player when ever they see fit.” …
I’ve always thought that bonuses should be something that are given to VIP players and in the form of no requirements of play-through. Instead the casinos have tuned these luring traps over the years with outrageous requirements designed to minimize their investment in future players that they hope pan out instead of what I would consider a true “comp” …
If anyone out there has a clear defintion of “bonus abuse” I’d love to hear it.
I would certainly agree that unreputable casinos can use the bonus clause to get out of paying legitimate wins.
As for reputable casinos, if a player is playing within the terms and conditions as set by the casino, then I don’t see how they could realistically claim ‘bonus abuse’ and void all winnings. They should reword their t&c’s (without of course giving a potential abuser a ‘how to abuse bonuses’ guide to use elsewhere.