@bingoadvantage 238158 wrote:
There is probably something to it indirectly. More likely a large chunk of the offline/online players are part of another subset of players where there is a more direct correlation.
This either/or fallacy definitely illustrates the Authors view and strongly suggests the bias of the study’s author (or for the cynical among us, the angle he is taking for funding.)
Touche, bingoadvantage… Also, it could have to do with the the variable of only 111 online gamblers were analyzed… As Boy Mitchell mentioned earlier, with such a small sampling, it’s hard to determine if the findings can truly be accurate.