@Dominique 203768 wrote:
Fencing on demand?
For me personally it would mean I don’t have to pull you everytime I get in a negative.
I will always still prefer programs that don’t have negative carryovers. There are only two programs with neg carryover I work with at all. And that’s because they are very good in all other ways.
But – even when affs still choose you over programs without negatives, your program will suffer from the removals. What costs you more?
As long as there is transparency in what the program does and the policies, I think any model will work. It depends on your relationship with the affiliate and how you communicate. I have been with a program which carried negative but never lost an affiliate due to player win. Please note that any massive win which probably would wipe off your next 6 month’s earnings will most likely be nulled by the casino. These calls are always case specific. Actually it is good to have winners as they tend to stick to the casino for longer and most winners dump the money back in next few months.
For those that are in a bad way we will do our most to help out where we can and this has been the case on a couple of occasions since I have been with CWC. We wont just leave you to rot.
Most programs that do carry forward will take care of you in one way or other. Like our good friend here.
And for the programs that do not carry forward the negatives, it is important to clarify the terms and conditions. For all you know you may be losing out in the long run if they have aggressive ‘fencing’ or ‘quarantine’ or ‘adjustment’ policies.
The best programs are those who simply absorb the negative and don’t retort to any fencing or quarantie or adjustments. But then they take a hit when the winning player drops money in the next payment cycle/ month.