Most complain that the changes are retroactive and I fail to see how this protects new affiliates?
It doesn’t protect NEW Affiliates, but that is THEIR choice going forward, not ours.
It’s not Ok to change the exsiting affiliates agreements.
Pretty simple, IMO.
The problem is that unlike business, here only one party seems to be obligated to a contract.
How do you figure that? I never agreed to a Player Quota, and neither did you.
The fact that you may be such a huge affiliate that it doesn’t affect YOU, doesn’t mean it won’t kill some smaller affiliates, or affiliates that focus STRICTLY on Tiered/Sub Affiliate type marketing.
With all due respect, you are not looking at the larger picture of this,.. just your own personal picture, which apparently won’t be affected by this proposed change.
I have no problem with a program hand selecting affiliates like BoDog did either.
Their choice, and that isn’t really relevant to this situation anyway.
We are talkng about EXSITING Agreements being altered to include Player Quotas.
The Player Quota is the Deal Breaker here.
I don’t think anyone has a big problem keeping their casinos up on their sites, but this thing needs to get straightened away fairly first.