@slotplayer 157315 wrote:
maybe that’s why CR can afford to add 6 new casinos while many programs seem to be struggling just to pay affiliates.
Yea it does make you wonder how much there bottom line was increased with wager-share, since it is feverently defended anytime anyone brings it up. 25% starting comission is pretty much industry standard and I really don’t see why it at least can’t be offered, according to CR 35% wager-share would cost them more than 25% rev-share. They should be grateful that we are willing to work for less money, unless of course they make better money on wager-share regardless. Players are gambling this is a losing proposition for them, so having a pay plan that has you hoping they win and continue to play and play should be obvious how you are losing out on a ton of money in the long haul. Getting paid based on what players lose is a much better idea since ultimatley they will lose it all at some point.