The player admitted using a blackjack strategy. He is a young man that just joined the casino, used a bonus that played with close to perfect strategy gives him a considerable edge over the casino, won big and withdrew. With this alone most profiling will start qualifying him as an advanced player.
I can’t believe I am reading this! Did i get that right? That a player who uses a “perfect strategy” is breaking the rules? This is exactly the type of thing that gives online casino gambling a bad name.
If the game is a proper game, it will still have a house edge and no strategy can beat that, merely minimise it. If a strategy can beat the house edge, with or without the help of a bonus,then there is something wrong at the casino end, not the player end and he should be paid properly and on time.
In regards to how “Vegas casinos” approach this, sure they may ask a player to leave their casino but they will pay him first if he hasn’t cheated – and using a strategy isn’t cheating. Every casino has the right to refuse a player for any reason as far as I am aware, but if they accept one, and one who has not acted fraudulently of dishonestly, they honour their terms and pay him before they lock him out.
Cirrus have a terrible reputation among players (and why on earth affiliates promote them I really don’t know) but if they want to try and change for the better then they should start by treating the player fairly at the very least.