@TheGooner 136952 wrote:
Now I realise that you’re talking about Google …
But in terms of ongoing success for a website this headline is so far wrong that it merits comment.
I get 90% of my traffic from reciprocal links – and for my main site that means around 120,000 visitors a month !!!
:inlove:Reciprocal links with quality and related sites is the best possible way to grow your site exposure – and surely is the sort of thing that google thinks this mythical “3rd tribe” you mentioned should be doing ?
This creates clusters of related content – as as I see it is EXACTLY THE WAY THE NET SURFING EXPERIENCE WAS MEANT TO BE.
IMO : Reciprocal links to quality related content is our ONLY linking strategy, and we display around 1.5 million pages a month now.
:hattip:
I am strong believer for linking, yet when I saw this email that was forwarded to me from an SEO newsletter (can not recall the name or I would give credit) it needed to be mentioned.
Is linking bad or does it work? can it harm you or not? what is considered good linking and not?